Listen Live
M-F 6AM-8AM

Blog

Kevin O’Neill: They Think We’re All Full Of…

October 4, 2017


I hoped to get to this subject on the air this morning, but we ran out of time. It’s follow-up to Tuesday’s on-air discussion about the choices voters made last November.

Joan C. Williams, the Distinguished Professor of Law and Founding Director of the Center of WorkLife Law at the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law, wrote this Harvard Business Review article almost a year ago. Williams’ recently published book, White Working Class: Overcoming Class Cluelessness in America, expands on the topic.

Please take a few minutes to read the article before you continue.

Williams describes a point of view that is not typically represented on the Stocks and Jocks radio show. Keep in mind that the article was published days after the election, so the passages that describe feelings about Trump probably have changed over time. Nevertheless, I believe the overriding themes still apply.

I use the article in a management class. I don’t do political discussion, but I do think it’s important for prospective managers to understand the people who are most likely to be reporting to them in their first supervisor or manager jobs. Because most of the class is product of the working class, the students tend to agree with Williams’ descriptions based on first hand experience. In fact, they tell me that the distinction between white working class and all working class as it pertains to straight talk, political correctness, men’s roles, and resentment of professionals is mostly non-existent.

I’m posting the article today hoping to build an understanding about how people react to news whether it be North Korea, hurricane relief, the shooting spree in Las Vegas, or NFL protests. Williams writes near the end of the article, “But to write off WWC anger as nothing more than racism is intellectual comfort food, and it is dangerous.” The point is important, but I think it applies beyond racism. It applied just as easily to claims that the working class is anti-intellectual, sexist, and/or just plain stupid.

Races work side by side in the working class world more than they do in most professional settings. Races serve side by side in the military with a disproportionate number of people serving raised in working class homes. The Venn diagrams of what white, black, Asian, and Hispanic working class people believe and treasure overlap significantly. I think that’s really important to recognize as we dig in our ideological heels while discussing politics. It’s also important to recognize that most working class people think those of us who have advanced degrees and professional careers are all generally full of (poop) regardless of our political leanings.


Kevin O’Neill: Backfire

October 2, 2017


October 2nd, 2017

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in this article are mine. They are not necessarily shared by other Stocks and Jocks hosts and contributors.

Definition

back·fire

verb

(of an engine) undergo a mistimed explosion in the cylinder or exhaust.

“a car backfired in the road”

(of a plan or action) rebound adversely on the originator; have the opposite effect to what was intended.

“overzealous publicity backfired on her”

Take a Knee Has Backfired

When Colin Kaepernick began the NFL’s anthem protest wave a little more than a year ago, he said:

“I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color. To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.”

One might disagree with his message. One might disagree with his method. However, there was no denying that the man had a purpose; and I believe he honestly believed in both his cause and his method.

Fast forward to October, 2017… As more NFL players have made Kaepernick’s protest into a movement that was growing even before President Trump fueled it with his comments at a September 22nd political rally, the purpose of the protest has been lost to a debate over honoring the flag and proper decorum when the anthem is played. Comparatively, discussion of police treatment of minorities is trivial.

We know NFL players are protesting, but who or what are they protesting? Is it Trump? Is it an expression of unity with Kaepernick? Is anyone discussing oppression of black people and people of color or bodies in the street, or is the conversation about the method of protest and whether the NFL should allow it? The original purpose of the protests has been lost.

The Sound

The sound of an engine backfiring is distinct, loud explosion. The backfire of NFL protests is equally distinct and loud. Yes, it’s the sound of booing when players take a knee for the anthem; but there is more. It’s also the louder than ever roar of the crowd when the flag is unfurled. It’s the sound of more people singing the anthem than ever before. How can the protesters counter that? They can’t. The subject has been changed.

The problem is that the NFL players chose a provocative act for their protest. That those who cherish the country and, therefore, its symbols took offense at the provocation was entirely predictable. It isn’t insensitive. It isn’t racist. It’s taking precisely the offense that the protest was intended to provoke.

The majority reaction should not have surprised anyone. The method of protest never was a method that would sway the majority. Many of the people who don’t understand why others are offended have the same reactions when their own favored institutions are attacked. Even when it’s deserved, dare to criticize their families, their alma maters, or their political affiliates. What reaction will you get?

The Big Mistake

Protest without action plan is shallow. Complaining without a solution is an unappealing personal trait. Have many players become involved outside of their anthem protests? Have they given their spare time to the cause? Have they engaged with law enforcement, city officials, civic leaders, and activists?

The football players are a bunch of amateurs in the protest biz. They have failed to anything other than create a more intense pregame ritual of patriotism.

The NFL hasn’t done better. The league has allowed itself to be neutered by failing to enforce its own policy. Was there a choice? Isn’t this a free speech issue?

Writing for the Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM), HR legal expert Shari Lau clarified the First Amendment issue.

No federal statute protects private employees who want to express their political opinions at work. The right to free speech under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution only guards against government censorship. So while public employers must be aware of their limitations, private companies have no such obligations under the amendment. Therefore, when Joe Employee says he has the right to free speech at work, you can confidently tell him otherwise.

Further, the NFL Operations Manual says the following.

The National Anthem must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the National Anthem.

During the National Anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the National Anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.

Why is the NFL allowing the players to violate the code with impunity? Here is NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy’s absurd explanation. “It’s policy. It’s not a rule. I think where people are getting confused is, rules, that’s like holding or defensive pass interference, that’s a rule. This is policy.”

McCarthy is correct that policies and rules are different, but his reasoning is wrong… as in Management 101 wrong. Policies are high level statements of what an organization requires. Boards of Directors and/or the C-Suite specify policies which are commended to managers who make rules to support them. Policies are not suggestions. Policies guide the rules.

Regardless of that important distinction, a policy is worthless if the league can’t or won’t enforce it. A policy that nobody follows is a waste of paper and ink..

TheNBA

The NBA says it will enforce its policy, as it did when it suspended Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf in 1996. Abdul-Rauf said standing for the anthem was against his Islamic beliefs because the flag was a symbol of oppression and that the United States had a long history of tyranny.  Eventually the parties reached a compromise. Abdul-Rauf stood during the playing of the national anthem; but he closed his eyes, looked downward, and prayed.

But the league is not stopping at the hard line. In addition to enforcing its policy, the NBA will provide a forum for players to take a stance in different ways. Deputy Commissioner Mark Tatum issued a memo last week that stated:

  • The league office will determine how to deal with any possible instance in which a player, coach, or trainer does not stand for the anthem.
  • Individual teams “do not have the discretion to waive” the rule that players, coaches and staff stand for the anthem.
  • The league has the discretion to discipline players who violate the rule.
  • The league does not want teams independently disciplining players.
  • The league suggests that teams address the current political climate by having players and coaches give a joint pregame address at their first home games, a message of unity and how the team is committed to bringing the community together this season.
  • The league also suggests teams might prepare a video tribute or public service announcement featuring “team leadership speaking about the issues they care about.”

The commissioner’s office sent a separate letter to all teams outlining six ongoing NBA community initiatives. The letter encouraged leaders from each team to provide any further ideas on how the NBA can be a presence in communities and assist with issues in society.

Better still, the league and the players union are working together. Commissioner Adam Silver and the union’s Executive Director Michele Roberts have pledged their joint support for players who address issues that matter to them. Tatum’s memo does the same, suggesting several other ways teams can develop their own impactful community programs “including mentorship programs, community gatherings, using basketball to build bridges between segments of a community and inviting community leaders to speak to the teams.”

I predict that the NBA’s approach will have impact. It will not backfire.


Frank Fahey: Market News for the Prepared Mind: 9.18-9.25.2017

September 18, 2017


“Chance favors the Prepared Mind.” – Louis Pasteur

“If I panic, everyone else panics.” – Kobe Bryant

“Any bull market covers a multitude of sins, so there may be all sorts of problems with the current system that we won’t see until the bear market comes.” – Ron Chernow

“Remember, I’m neither a bear nor a bull, I’m an agnostic opportunist. I want to make money short and long-term. I want to find good situations and exploit them.” – Jim Cramer

“Panic is a natural human response to danger, but it’s one that severely compounds the risk.” – David Ignatius 

 

Investors were caught of guard last week. September is historically a very poor performing month. There have been litanies of problems: Hurricane Harvey, North Korea, Hurricane Irma and Bitcoin. What happened?

The Dow hit record highs four days in a row. The S&P 500 closed the week at another new record high – up 1.58% for the week. The other major indexes turned in equally stellar performances. The small-cap dominated Russell 2000 led the way with gains of 2.31%. The rally left the cognoscenti struggling for explanations.

Here is an overview of the US market behavior last week and for 2017 YTD:

Index 15-Sep Change % Weekly 2017 YTD Volatility of Index
Dow Jones Industrials (DJIA) 22268.34 470.55 2.16% 12.68% 9.84% (VXD)
S&P 500 (SPX) 2500.23 38.80 1.58% 11.70% 10.17% (VIX)
NASDAQ 100 (NDX) 5988.00 74.33 1.26% 23.12% 12.51% (VXN)
Russell 2000 (RUT) 1431.72 32.30 2.31% 5.50% 11.83%(RVX)
S&P 100 (OEX) 1105.11 18.13 1.67% 11.47% 7.80%(VXO)
Dow Jones Transportation (TRAN) 4603.58 42.71 0.94% 13.63% NA
Crude Oil (CLV7) 50.37 2.81 5.91% -6.53% 26.65%(OVX)
Gold (GCZ7) 1323.50 (27.70) -2.05% 14.89% 12.06 (GVZ)
CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) 10.17 (1.95) -16.09% NA

Data Source: OptionVue8 

The biggest news on the VIX front is the return of Russell Rhoads blogging at http://www.cboe.com/blogs about the VIX and associated volatility issues. Russell is also a terrific guest on Stocks & Jocks every Thursday morning (listen live)! Of special interest are his series of reports from the CBOE Risk Management Conference.

The monthly September VIX Futures contract goes off the board on the open Wednesday.

Here is an overview of last week for the VIX and related products:

Indexes Ticker 15-Sep 8-Sep Change % Change
CBOE Volatility Index VIX 10.170 12.125 -1.955 -16.12%
VIX September Future (9/20/2017) VXU7 11.125 13.275 (2.15) -16.20%
VIX October Future (10/18/2017) VXV7 12.925 14.325 (1.40) -9.77%
VIX November Future (11/15/2017) VXX7 14.175 14.875 (0.70) -4.71%
CBOE Short-term Volatility Index VXST 8.30 11.29 (2.99) -26.48%
CBOE 3 Month Volatility Index VXV 12.96 14.69 (1.73) -11.78%
CBOE Mid-term Volatility Index (6 month) VXMT 15.09 16.37 (1.28) -7.82%
VIX of VIX VVIX 90.63 100.12 (9.49) -9.48%
CBOE SKEW Index SKEW 144.54 135.39 9.15 6.76%
Long VIX ETP’s
ProShares Ultra VIX Short Term Futures ETF UVXY 24.69 31.83 (7.14) -22.43%
iPath S&P 500 VIX Short Term Futures ETN VXX 42.80 48.52 (5.72) -11.79%
ProShares VIX Short Term Futures ETF VIXY 35.57 40.26 (4.69) -11.65%
iPath S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN VXZ 21.38 22.47 (1.09) -4.85%
Inverse VIX ETP’s
ProShares Short VIX Short Term Future ETF SVXY 86.04 76.33 9.71 12.72%
Daily Inverse VIX Short Term ETN XIV 89.61 79.70 9.91 12.43%
Data Source: OptionVue8

This will be one of the most important weeks of the year when it comes to economic data. We are in the midst of a Central Bank bull market. The Federal Reserve holds its regularly scheduled meeting, and is expected to detail a timetable for reducing its balance sheet. We, also, get data on existing home sales and housing starts. The wild cards remain North Korea and the District of Columbia.

The god’s are conspiring against me. I will include my usual scans of earnings announcements next week. There are very few earnings announcements this week. The highlights include: Adobe Systems, Autozone, Fedex, Bed Bath and Beyond, Analogic, General Mills, Herman Miller, and CarMax. Confirm the date and time of any company’s earnings announcement before trading any earnings announcement strategy. The most accurate source of this information is the company’s investor relations website.

 

Advice to stimulate your imagination:

“Ideas come and go, stories stay.” – Nassim Nicholas Taleb

“There is no training, classroom or otherwise, that can prepare for trading the last third of a move, whether it’s the end of a bull market or end of a bear market.” – Paul Tudor Jones 

“A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when submitted for insight and understanding.” – Marshall McLuhan

“Don’t give me timing, give me time.” – Jesse Livermore

“Freedom is what you do with what’s been done to you.” – Jean-Paul Sartre 

 

Monday, September 18: 

Economic: Housing Market Index – 10:00.

International: Eurozone HICP – 5:00 AM.

Other:  Listen to Frank Fahey on “Stocks and Jocks” Listen Live

 

Tuesday, September 19: 

Economic: Housing Start – 8:30, Current Account – 8:30, Import and Export Prices – 8:30, Redbook – 8:55.

International: Japan Merchandise Trade – 7:50 PM.

Other: FOMC meeting begins.

 

Wednesday, September 20:

Economic: MBA Mortgage Applications – 7:00, Existing Homes Sales – 10:00, , EIA Petroleum Status Report – 10:30/

International Economic: Germany –PPI – 2:00 AM, Great Britain Retail Sales – 4:30 AM.

Other: FOMC Forecasts – 2:00 PM, Fed Chair Press Conference – 2:30 PM. September VIX Futures contract (VXU7) goes off the board on the open Wednesday.

 

Thursday, September 21: 

Economic: Weekly Jobless Claims – 8:30, Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Survey – 8:30, FHFA House Price Index – 9:00, Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index – 9:45, Leading Indicators – 10:00, EIA Natural Gas Report – 10:30, Money Supply – 4:30.

International: No major announcements.

 

Friday, September 22:

Economic: Retail Sales – 8:30, Empire State Manufacturing Survey – 8:30, Industrial Production – 9:15, Business Inventories – 10:–, Consumer Sentiment – 10:00, Baker Hughes Rig Count – 1:00.

International: France GDP = 2:45 AM, France PMI Composite Flash – 3:00 AM, Germany PMI Composite Flash – 3:30 AM, Eurozone PMI Composite Flash – 4:00 AM.

Other: San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President John Williams to speak at the Swiss National Bank Research Conference 2017 – Monetary Policy Design, Conduct and Effects in Zurich, Switzerland, with media Q&A – 6:00 AM, Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank President Esther George to deliver the keynote at the “Global Oil Supply & Demand: Prospects for Greater Balance” Conference in Oklahoma City, with audience Q&A – 9:30 AM.

 

Monday, September 25:

Economic: Chicago Fed National Activity Index – 8:30, Dallas Fed Manufacturing Survey – 10:30.

International: No major announcements.

Other: New York Federal Reserve Bank President William Dudley will speak about workforce development at Onondaga Community College in Syracuse, New York, with audience Q&A – 8:30 AM, Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans to speak about current economic conditions or monetary policy at the Economic of Grand Rapids Luncheon Meeting, with audience and media Q&A, in Grand Rapids, Michigan – 12:40PM, Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Neel Kashkari to participate in Eye of the Hawk Town Hall Event in Grand Forks, North Dakota, with audience Q&A. – 6:30PM.

 

Follow Stocks & Jocks on Twitter — Follow Frank Fahey on Twitter


Hal Snarr: Will the cocktails the policy mixologists keep serving result in the nastiest economic hangover ever?

September 13, 2017


When the economy begins to sink into recession, politicians, economists, policy wonks, and bureaucrats at the Federal Reserve (the Fed) start serving up cocktails of fiscal and monetary stimulus. Although history has shown that the cocktails that these mixologists concoct ultimately gives us a nasty economic hangover, it seems that they have not learned this lesson.

The graph below shows how inflationary monetary policy affects the Case-Shiller Home Price Index. In this diagram, quarterly home prices are plotted versus the M2 money stock from just over two years earlier. Since both variables are in log-scale, the red line in this graph implies that after the Fed raises the growth rate of M2 by 1%, the home prices rise by around 0.367%, nine quarters later. Since the average quarter-to-quarter change in the M2 growth rate is about 16% (this was the case between 1995 and 2004), the line it the graph implies that raising M2’s growth rate by 16% per quarter causes the growth in home prices to increase by 6% per quarter.

The compounding effect of a 16%-quarter-to-quarter rise in M2 has a substantial effect on home prices. For example, suppose the M2 growth rate is 2% (M2 growth rate was 1.7% in the third quarter of 1995) at a time when the Fed decides to set interest rates low for an extended period of time. After 12 consecutive quarters of compounding, the quarter-to-quarter M2 growth rate would accelerate up to 10% (the M2 growth rate was 10.2% in the second quarter of 1998). Further, suppose that the quarter-to-quarter home price growth rate is 12% nine quarters prior to the Fed commencing its inflation (the average growth rate in the home price index was 12% from 1997 to 2007). With home prices accelerating at 6% per quarter, the quarterly growth rate in home prices would reach 119% after 12 consecutive quarters of M2 growing at 16% per quarter.

The acceleration in an asset’s price is referred to as an asset bubble. These are popped after the Fed pokes bubbles with restrictive monetary policy. Poking asset bubbles usually pushes the economy into a recession. This seems obvious in the graph below. It shows that prior to every recession since the early 1980s, a rapid rise in the federal funds rate has resulted in a recession a few months later.

The graphs below illustrate how restrictive monetary policy slows economic growth. In these diagrams, quarterly economic growth rates are plotted versus the quarterly federal funds rate from the previous year. Since both variables are in log-scale, the red lines in these graphs imply that after the Fed raises the federal funds rate by 1%, the economic growth rate declines by 0.4% (0.37% for the earlier period and 0.46% for the latter period). Since the Fed’s average quarter-to-quarter adjustment of the federal funds is 23% (this was the case between 2009 and 2017), the two charts imply economic growth declines by 10% per quarter after the federal funds rate is raised by 23% from the previous quarter.

The compounding effect of a 23%-quarter-to-quarter increase in the federal funds rate is substantial. For example, suppose the Fed wants to normalize rates after it had set its target at 1% for an extended period to push economic growth back up to 3%. Further, suppose that 4.25% is considered “normal” for the federal funds rate. To raise the fed funds rate from 1% to 4.25%, the Fed has to boost its target by 23% a quarter for eight consecutive quarters. Doing this dampens economic growth by around 10% per quarter. After the dust settles and negative compounding kicks in over eight consecutive quarters, the economic growth slips to 1.43%, two years after it had recovered to 3%.

The chart below plots the average annual federal funds rate over time. It suggests that the monetary policy mixologists at the Fed have failed to learn the lesson that its policies cause the business cycle. The first part of this lesson, call it Lesson 1, is: Economic expansions, the white areas in the graph, begin after the Fed pushes the price of credit too low for too long. The second lesson, Lesson 2, is: Economic recessions, the shaded vertical bars in the graph, begin after the Fed pushes the price of credit well above the natural rate of interest.

Is it comforting that the tail end of the above graph, from 2009 and on, appears to show that the Fed has learned Lesson 2? The graph shows that the Fed has slowly pushed the federal funds rate from near zero to around 1 percent in the nine years following the 2008 financial crisis. Keeping the price of credit near zero for such a long time seems to show that the Fed has finally learned that normalizing interest rates from a very low rate triggers recession.

On the other hand, the right tail of this graph also suggests that the Fed has not learned Lesson 1. The last time it kept interest rates at around 1% for a few years resulted in the longest recession since the Fed was given the keys to the economy. Since 2008, the Fed has kept interest rates at an even lower level for nine years and counting. If Austrian Business Cycle Theory is correct, then the historic monetary stimulus party of the last nine years may trigger the most painful economic hangover ever.

 

Follow Stocks & Jocks on Twitter — Follow Hal Snarr on Twitter


Frank Fahey: Market News for the Prepared Mind: 9.11-9.18.2017

September 11, 2017


“Chance favors the Prepared Mind.” – Louis Pasteur

“Millions saw the apple fall, but Newton was the one who asked why.” – Bernard Baruch

“Panic causes tunnel vision.” – Simon Sinek

“A stock operator has to fight a lot of expensive enemies within himself.” – Jesse Livermore

“Panic is a natural human response to danger, but it’s one that severely compounds the risk.” – David Ignatius 

 

The major indexes continue remain within easy striking distance of all-time highs. There is almost palpable disbelief among the financial cognoscenti that the indexes have not had a correction. Once again I have been reminded about the perils of ignoring a trend. The trend is bullish.

A characteristic of a bull market is the markets celebrate good news while ignoring bad news. Bad news sells. As a result, purveyors of news and opinion focus on the bad news as a means to market their product. The bad news last week was impressive. Natural disasters (Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Jose), gas shortages, weakness in the US dollar, and an H-Bomb test by North Korea dominated the news. The Republican Party received the worst news when Nancy Pelosi and Donald Trump cut a deal. The deal removed a potential debt ceiling crisis from the equation. The bad news was not totally ignored. This litany of bad news had only a minor effect on the market.

Here is an overview of the US market behavior last week and for 2017 YTD:

Index 8-Sep Change % Weekly 2017 YTD Volatility of Index
Dow Jones Industrials (DJIA) 21797.79 (189.77) -0.86% 10.30% 12.01% (VXD)
S&P 500 (SPX) 2461.43 (15.12) -0.61% 9.97% 12.12% (VIX)
NASDAQ 100 (NDX) 5913.67 15.77 0.27% 21.59% 16.07% (VXN)
Russell 2000 (RUT) 1399.42 (14.10) -1.00% 3.12% 15.49%(RVX)
S&P 100 (OEX) 1086.98 (8.27) -0.76% 9.64% 10.761%(VXO)
Dow Jones Transportation (TRAN) 4560.87 69.74 1.55% 12.57% NA
Crude Oil (CLV7) 47.56 0.21 0.44% -11.75% 29.49%(OVX)
Gold (GCZ7) 1351.20 21.30 1.60% 17.29% 13.77 (GVZ)
CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) 12.12 1.99 19.64% NA

Data Source: OptionVue8 

Negative news was ignored by the equity markets, but it was not ignored by the VIX and other volatility products. The CBOE Short-term Volatility Index (VXST) showed the greatest reaction to uncertainty by closing at 11.29. up 2.32 or 25.86%. The front month VIX future (VXU7) contango settled at 7.91% vs. Thursday’s contango of 9.75%. Narrowing of the contango percentage shows a greater relative concern for the front month versus the second month.

Here is an overview of last week for the VIX and related products:

Indexes Ticker 8-Sep 1-Sep Change % Change
CBOE Volatility Index VIX 12.12 11.28 0.84 7.45%
VIX September Future (9/20/2017) VXU7 13.275 13.075 0.20 1.53%
VIX October Future (10/18/2017) VXV7 14.325 14.025 0.30 2.14%
VIX November Future (11/15/2017) VXX7 14.875 14.425 0.45 3.12%
CBOE Short-term Volatility Index VXST 11.29 8.97 2.32 25.86%
CBOE 3 Month Volatility Index VXV 14.69 13.99 0.70 5.00%
CBOE Mid-term Volatility Index (6 month) VXMT 16.37 15.42 0.95 6.16%
VIX of VIX VVIX 100.12 93.53 6.59 7.05%
CBOE SKEW Index SKEW 135.39 130.16 5.23 4.02%
Long VIX ETP’s
ProShares Ultra VIX Short Term Futures ETF UVXY 31.83 30.88 0.95 3.08%
iPath S&P 500 VIX Short Term Futures ETN VXX 48.52 47.68 0.84 1.76%
ProShares VIX Short Term Futures ETF VIXY 40.26 39.63 0.63 1.59%
iPath S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN VXZ 22.47 21.86 0.61 2.79%
Inverse VIX ETP’s
ProShares Short VIX Short Term Future ETF SVXY 76.33 77.96 (1.63) -2.09%
Daily Inverse VIX Short Term ETN XIV 79.70 73.89 5.81 7.86%

Data Source: OptionVue8 

The second week of September is light on economic reports. The only numbers of note will be on inflation and industrial production. The impact of the hurricanes may push Fed unwinding further out into the future.the future. The week winds up with consumer sentiment winds up Friday and will tally the psychological effects of both Harvey as well as Hurricane Irma. The wild cards remain North Korea and pull together a tax reform bill.

There are very few earnings announcements this week. The highlights include: United Natural Foods, Cracker Barrel, and Oracle. Confirm the date and time of any company’s earnings announcement before trading any earnings announcement strategy. The most accurate source of this information is the company’s investor relations website.

Advice to stimulate your imagination:

“Ideas come and go, stories stay.” – Nassim Nicholas Taleb

“Bull markets are born in pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism and die on euphoria.” – John Templeton 

“A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when submitted for insight and understanding.” – Marshall McLuhan

“Don’t give me timing, give me time.” – Jesse Livermore

“Freedom is what you do with what’s been done to you.” – Jean-Paul Sartre

 

Monday, September 11:

Listen to Frank Fahey on “Stocks and Jocks” Listen Live

Economic: No major announcements.

International: Japan Tertiary Index – 1:30AM.

Earnings: None meeting scan criteria.

 

Tuesday, September 12:

Economic: NFIB Small Business Optimism Index – 6:00, Redbook – 8:55, JOLTS – 10:00.

International: Great Britain CPI – 4:00 AM.

Earnings: None meeting scan criteria.


Wednesday, September 13:
Economic: MBA Mortgage Applications – 7:00, PPI – FD – 8:30, EIA Petroleum Status Report – 10:30

International Economic: Germany CPI – 3:15 AM, Great Britain Labour Market Report – 4:30 AM, Eurozone Industrial Production – 5:00 AM.

Earnings: None meeting scan criteria.

 

Thursday, September 14:

Economic: Weekly Jobless Claims – 8:30, Consumer Price Index – – 8:30, Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index – 9:45, Quarterly Services Survey – 10:00, EIA Natural Gas Report – 10:30, Money Supply – 4:30.

International: Great Britain Retail Sales – 4:30 AM.

Other: Bank of England Announcement & Minutes – 7:00 AM.

Earnings: None meeting scan criteria.

 

Friday, September 15:

QUADRUPLE WITCHING

Economic: Retail Sales – 8:30, Empire State Manufacturing Survey – 8:30, Industrial Production – 9:15, Business Inventories – 10:00, Consumer Sentiment – 10:00, Baker Hughes Rig Count – 1:00.

International: Eurozone Merchandise Trade – 5:00 AM.

Earnings: None meeting scan criteria.


Monday, September 18:

Economic: Housing Market Index – 10:00.

International: Eurozone HICP – 5:00 AM.

Earnings: None meeting scan criteria.

 

Follow Stocks & Jocks on Twitter — Follow Frank Fahey on Twitter